Chapter 121 presents a sublime affirmation of the Soul’s transformation and union with God, celebrated by Holy Church, the Soul herself, and the Holy Trinity. The Soul is praised as one who lives entirely by the divine essence (“the kernel”), surpassing all dependence on human will, reason, or law-not in opposition to them, but in fulfillment of their highest aim. Her purity, constancy, and inner illumination set her apart as a banner who precedes the King, a soul beyond the confines of servile fear and rational striving. The Holy Trinity confirms that she has dined at the divine table and been filled with heavenly wine, rendering her permanently inebriated with divine love and unable to be drawn back to lesser spiritual states. Yet she is also instructed to keep silence about the mysteries she knows, lest others-still bound by reason and will-misunderstand and condemn themselves. Yielding to Love’s counsel, she agrees to conceal what is incommunicable, expressing instead her devotion through symbolic song.
—
1. “Courteous and well taught lady, says Holy Church, how this is wisely said. You are the true star, who brings the dawn, And the pure sun without spot, who receives no impurity, And the fullest moon, who never wanes; And so you are the banner, who goes before the King.”
Holy Church praises the Soul with exalted imagery: she is likened to celestial bodies-star, sun, moon-symbolizing purity, constancy, and spiritual illumination. Calling her a “banner before the King” identifies her as a forerunner and exemplar, someone who precedes Christ the King in readiness and spiritual authority. This imagery frames the soul as having surpassed ordinary sanctity, embodying divine presence in herself.
2. “You live completely by the kernel, who no longer has will, And those live by straw and by chaff… who have retained the practice of human will.”
This contrast between “kernel” and “chaff” refers to the distinction between the soul who has surrendered her will entirely to God and those who still act out of self-will, even under the guise of religion. The kernel, or inner essence, is divine life; the chaff is empty effort. The soul that lives by the kernel is beyond human striving and religious legalism.
3. “Such folk are servants of the law, But this Soul is above the law, Not contrary to the law.”
This crucial statement establishes that the soul who is emptied of self-will is not in rebellion against divine or ecclesiastical law, but has transcended its external necessity. She embodies the law’s deepest intention: love. This aligns with St. Paul’s teaching that love fulfills the law (Romans 13:10). She is “above the law” because the law now lives within her.
4. “Ah sweetest Love Divine, who art within the Trinity, The hour is such that I marvel how those can continue, Those who are governed by Reason and Fear, Desire, Work, and Will …”
The Soul expresses amazement that others can persist in spiritual effort governed by lower faculties like reason, fear, or will. This critique isn’t against effort per se but points to a deeper state: she has entered into a union where divine Love is the only principle. She sees “being ordered by nothingness”-the state of full detachment-as the highest nobility.
5. “O heavenly rock, says the Holy Trinity… You have been at my table… you have savored my feast so fully … That the bouquet alone makes you inebriated, and you will never be other.”
The Trinity itself addresses the soul, affirming her complete transformation through divine nourishment. “Feast” and “wine” symbolize interior participation in divine life. The Soul has tasted the mystery of God so deeply that even the aroma-“the bouquet”-of divine truth leaves her perpetually “inebriated,” i.e., overwhelmed by love and unshakably fixed in divine joy.
6. “No one but you knows how to speak of it, And thus you will not be able to give your heart In any other practice for any price.”
This reveals the exclusivity of the soul’s union with God. Because she has entered into the inner reality of divine Love, no external practice or discipline could attract or substitute for what she has received. Her heart is sealed, irrevocably claimed by the Divine.
7. “I pray you… That you no longer will to tell the secrets Which you know: The others will condemn themselves because of it…”
The Trinity warns the Soul against revealing too much of this spiritual path. The danger is not the truth itself, but the unpreparedness of others who, governed by reason and desire, may misunderstand or reject it and thus harm themselves spiritually. Divine discretion is required at these depths.
8. “Paradise? says this chosen one, would you not accord them something else? Thus indeed murderers will have it, if they wish to cry for mercy!”
In a striking moment, the Soul questions the generosity of God’s mercy, recognizing its vastness to the point where even the most undeserving (symbolized by murderers) may attain paradise by sincere repentance. Yet she yields and submits to divine will, agreeing to remain silent, showing obedience and humility even in her spiritual insight.
9. “But in spite of this I will keep silence about it, since you wish it. And thus I will say a verse of song, with the leave of Fine Love.”
The Soul, out of reverence for divine will, agrees to veil the secrets of her experience. Yet she expresses herself through a song-a poetic form of praise and intimacy that conveys without fully disclosing. This closing line preserves the tension between hiddenness and revelation, mystery and expression.
This chapter represents the culmination of the Soul’s journey: she is not only praised by the Church but also personally addressed and claimed by the Trinity. Her state transcends religious practice and doctrine, becoming pure participation in divine life, yet always under the guidance and discretion of Love.
—
1. Who is the main speaker at the beginning of this chapter, and how does she address the Soul?
The main speaker is Holy Church, who praises the Soul in exalted poetic terms. She addresses the Soul as a “courteous and well taught lady,” calling her a true star, pure sun, fullest moon, and banner who goes before the King. These images emphasize the Soul’s purity, constancy, spiritual authority, and precedence in divine intimacy. Holy Church acknowledges that the Soul has transcended ordinary spiritual categories and lives entirely by divine essence.
2. What does Holy Church mean by saying that the Soul “lives completely by the kernel”?
To “live completely by the kernel” means the Soul lives from the innermost essence-the divine life-without dependence on her own will. In contrast, others live by “straw,” “chaff,” and “gross silage,” which symbolize superficial or self-driven religiosity. The kernel refers to the pure substance of divine union, while the chaff represents spiritual activity still tied to self-will and ego.
3. How is the Soul described in relation to the law?
Holy Church proclaims that this Soul is above the law, but not contrary to it. She no longer lives by external observance or self-regulation, because divine will fully governs her. The law has been internalized and fulfilled in her through love. Her state surpasses legal observance but does not reject or violate it; instead, it transcends it in perfect charity.
4. How does the Soul express amazement about others’ spiritual lives?
The Soul marvels that others can continue in a spiritual life governed by Reason, Fear, Desire, Work, and Will, unaware of the “grand nobility of being ordered by nothingness.” She is astonished that anyone would choose to remain in the lesser way of self-effort when a higher path of complete surrender and divine ordering is available. Her comments critique the limitations of conventional spirituality.
5. What does the Holy Trinity say to the Soul, and how does it confirm her state?
The Holy Trinity affirms the Soul’s transformation, stating that she has “been at my table” and partaken of the divine feast and wine, so deeply that even the bouquet-its aroma-makes her perpetually inebriated with divine love. She is praised as one who knows the inner mysteries that no one else can speak of, and who can never return to lesser forms of practice. This marks her as fully claimed by God.
6. Why does the Trinity ask the Soul to be silent about what she knows?
The Trinity urges her not to reveal the inner secrets of divine union because others, governed by Reason, Desire, and Will, might misinterpret or reject them, causing their own condemnation. The concern is pastoral discretion: deep truths are not always safe for general revelation. Her silence protects others from spiritual harm and honors the ineffable nature of divine union.
7. What is the Soul’s reaction to the idea that such people will receive paradise?
The Soul responds with righteous indignation, asking if something greater could not be given to those truly united to God, since even murderers can obtain paradise through repentance. This moment reflects her desire for perfect justice, yet she ultimately submits to God’s will, choosing silence out of obedience.
8. What does the Soul say she will do instead of revealing the secrets she knows?
Instead of disclosing the hidden truths, the Soul says she will sing a verse of song, with the leave of Fine Love. This poetic gesture allows her to express love and devotion without fully revealing divine secrets. It reflects the mystical tradition’s use of symbol and poetry to gesture toward what cannot be plainly spoken.
——————–
In Chapter 122, the Soul begins her ecstatic song, celebrating her complete liberation from self, others, the world, and even the Virtues, through the gracious action of Divine Love. She recounts her former servitude to Reason and the Virtues as a beast-like state, now surpassed by Love’s unmerited intervention, which freed her and elevated her into the divine school of contemplative union. In this union, thought, speech, and action lose all value, as Love alone acts within her. The Holy Spirit, described as the Lover without a mother, indwells her heart and fills her with ineffable joy. Her union with the Trinity leads to an identity beyond selfhood, where she affirms that only God is, and she is not. Traditional religious authorities and virtue-based systems are critiqued as bound by Reason, Desire, and Fear, and thus unable to grasp the mystery of divine Love. The chapter climaxes in the Soul’s radical confession of total annihilation: she does not love God-He alone loves, acts, and is. This is the divine seed, Loyal Love, implanted in the soul through willed nothingness.
—
1. “In view of the ascent on high and the precious entry, and the worthy indwelling of human creation by the sweet humanity of the Son of God… Fine Love separated me through courtesy.”
The Soul begins by anchoring her song in the mystery of the Incarnation and the glorification of Christ’s humanity. This divine movement sets the precedent for her own spiritual ascent. Because of this divine mercy, Fine Love-a personified divine love-separates her from all attachments, including herself, others, and even virtue-as-effort. This is not a rejection of goodness, but a liberation into something higher: pure receptivity to divine love.
2. “Such a beast I was… That I could not express it to you from my heart.”
Looking back, the Soul sees her former life of striving through Reason and Virtue as bestial-incapable of true divine expression. This is a radical humility, even disdain, for the religious life governed by human effort. Her transformation is not through intellectual ascent or moral achievement but by grace alone.
3. “And when Love saw me think about her, on account of the Virtues, she did not refuse me, but instead she freed me… There I was filled and satisfied by her.”
Love responds not to merit but to desire. When the Soul, even in her imperfection, thinks of Love, Love comes to her and frees her from the burdensome service of Virtue-as-task. In Love’s “divine school,” no labor is required-only receptivity. Fulfillment comes from being, not doing.
4. “Thought is no longer of worth to me, / Nor work, nor speech.”
The Soul renounces all intellectual, active, and verbal modes of spiritual life. Divine Love has drawn her so high that these faculties no longer serve her ascent. This is pure apophatic mysticism: a knowing that transcends knowing, a love that transcends action.
5. “It is [of] the Deity pure, / About whom Reason knows not how to speak, / And of a Lover… / His name is Holy Spirit…”
She now sings of the Holy Spirit as both divine and Lover-an interior presence beyond Reason’s grasp. This indwelling is intimate and ecstatic: the Holy Spirit brings union, joy, and transformation. The Lover is not external, but is her own divine interiority.
6. “You do not will to do anything, / Lover, without my will.”
In the paradox of divine union, the Soul affirms that her will and God’s will are no longer separate. God wills in her and through her, and thus her will is entirely God’s. This is not absorption, but a nuptial alignment of wills in love.
7. “Ah, but to whom will I say it? / Seraphim know not how to speak of it.”
The ineffability of divine union is so profound that even angels cannot express it. The Soul acknowledges the unutterable beauty and mystery of what she experiences, hinting at the limits of theology and even mystical discourse.
8. “Willing pure nothingness purifies [the heart]…”
This is the heart of Porete’s spirituality: willed nothingness. By willing nothing, the Soul is made ready for divine union. This is the purification that prepares the Soul for the indwelling of divine fullness, beyond thought and beyond self.
9. “I used to be enclosed / in the servitude of captivity…”
Desire, will, and affection are described as imprisoning forces. Even natural piety and reason were forms of captivity. Only the light of divine love can break these chains and make possible the “enterprise” of full union with God.
10. “This gift no human understands, / As long as he serves any Virtue whatever…”
Porete’s controversial theology is on full display here: as long as one serves virtue, one cannot understand the gift of divine union. Virtue, in its ordinary sense, must be transcended. Only the annihilation of self-will and moral striving opens the soul to divine Love.
11. “Beguines say I err, / priests, clerics, and Preachers…”
Here she anticipates the scandal of her doctrine. The institutional Church and religious orders reject her teaching because it undermines the systems of Reason, Will, and Fear on which they depend. She attributes their rejection not to truth but to spiritual blindness.
12. “Truth declares to my heart, / That I am loved by One alone…”
Truth speaks internally, not externally. The Soul is loved by God alone, and this love is a gift with no expectation of return. The delight of this love annihilates even her own thought and raises her to eternal joy. This is not a reward-it is a transformation.
13. “He is, and I am not…”
This is Porete’s ultimate expression of self-emptying. The Soul no longer claims even to love God; it is God alone who loves in her. She no longer is. Only God is. This annihilation is not nihilism but the deepest union, the soul’s participation in Divine Being.
This chapter is a high point of The Mirror of Simple Souls, offering poetic, ecstatic testimony to the Soul’s journey beyond virtue, reason, and will into the pure freedom of divine love.
—
1. What is the theological basis the Soul offers for her separation from self, others, and the world?
The Soul roots her separation in the mystery of the Incarnation and Ascension: Christ’s elevation to the right hand of the Father sanctifies human nature. Because of this divine act, Fine Love (personified Divine Love) separates her from all created attachments: herself, others, the world, the Virtues, and even the spirit of affection. This separation is not a rejection of creation, but a movement into divine union. Her detachment is an act of divine courtesy that liberates her from the domination of Reason and brings her to the divine school of Love.
2. Why does the Soul denounce her former service to Virtues? What is the tone and significance of this reflection?
She calls her past self a “beast” for serving the Virtues through effort and Reason. Her tone is one of utter disdain and regret. This is because she now sees that effort-based virtue (as practiced under Reason) obstructed her intimacy with Divine Love. It was only when she began to desire Love herself that Love responded-not to her virtue, but to her longing. Thus, her spiritual maturity is marked by a shift from moralistic striving to pure receptivity.
3. What role does Love play in the Soul’s transformation?
Love is both initiator and sustainer of the Soul’s transformation. When the Soul merely thinks about Love, Love responds and delivers her from servitude to virtue. Love then brings her into a divine school where she learns without doing. There, she is filled and satisfied without any effort. Love elevates her beyond thought, speech, and work, drawing her into a contemplative state where she no longer has intent or will. This movement is entirely initiated by Love’s gaze and gift, not the Soul’s merit.
4. How does the Soul describe the Holy Spirit and His role in divine union?
She describes the Holy Spirit as her Lover without a mother, begotten of the Father and the Son. He enters into her heart and causes joy to remain within her. This is a deeply intimate and interiorized experience of the Spirit: not doctrinal or rational, but unitive and ecstatic. The Holy Spirit is both gift and the giver of joy, drawing the Soul into divine peace and nourishment through love.
5. Why does the Soul say, “Thought is no longer of worth to me”?
This line encapsulates her apophatic stance. Thought, work, and speech-hallmarks of conventional spiritual life-have become worthless in comparison to the divine union she experiences. Her soul has been lifted beyond these faculties by Love’s divine gaze. This signals a move beyond kataphatic theology into a silent, receptive, and utterly passive state where only God’s will remains active.
6. What is the Soul’s attitude toward traditional religious life, including the Beguines, priests, and religious orders?
She expresses strong criticism and even sorrow that these groups reject her teaching. They accuse her of error because she has spoken of “the being of the one purified by Love”-a state they do not understand because their minds are still governed by Reason, Fear, Will, and Desire. She sees their attachment to virtue-practice and theological systems as barriers to divine union, and this lack of understanding causes them to condemn what they cannot grasp.
7. How does the Soul define “pure nothingness” and what role does it play in union with God?
Pure nothingness is a willed dispossession of self. It is not passivity or self-hatred, but an active surrender of all that is not God: will, intellect, virtue, and desire. Through this willed nothingness, the Soul is purified and made ready for divine union. It allows the divine seed-Loyal Love-to impregnate the Soul. In this state, she becomes receptive to the full indwelling of divine goodness.
8. What does the Soul mean by “I have said that I will love Him. I lie, for I am not”?
This is the Soul’s most radical expression of annihilation. She no longer claims agency even in loving God. She asserts that only God is; she is not. Her identity has been so absorbed into divine will and being that she no longer maintains even the illusion of separate action or merit. This is not despair, but exaltation-the total fusion of Lover and beloved in which only Divine Love remains.
9. What critique does the Soul make of Reason and its place in spiritual understanding?
She repeatedly states that Reason is incapable of comprehending divine Love, the Holy Spirit, or union with God. Reason can only operate in the realm of virtues and moral behavior, not in the ineffable mystery of divine union. This is why the religious authorities, grounded in Reason, condemn her experience. She doesn’t oppose Reason per se, but sees it as wholly inadequate for the depths of Love’s mystery.
10. How does this chapter encapsulate Porete’s central theological vision?
This chapter distills Porete’s radical mystical theology: the soul must be annihilated-emptied of all faculties, virtues, and self-will-to be filled with God alone. Divine union is not earned but given, and it cannot be spoken of by Reason or understood through religious systems. The indwelling of the Holy Spirit, the Lover, transforms the soul entirely. In this state, only God acts; the soul is nothing, and this nothingness is the space for divine fullness.
——————–
Chapter 123 teaches that the soul’s journey toward divine freedom requires a transformation of love-from natural, human affection to pure, divine love. The Soul reflects on a key moment in Scripture when Jesus told His Apostles that He must go away so they could receive the Holy Spirit, revealing that their attachment to Him was still rooted in natural love, not yet refined by the Spirit. This departure, though painful, was necessary to make way for a deeper union with God through the indwelling of divine grace. The Soul uses her past experience of spiritual immaturity to guide those still seeking the path, emphasizing that while natural love does not separate one from God’s grace, it must be transcended for the full reception of the Holy Spirit, whose gifts require a love untainted by the self or nature.
—
1. “I wish to speak about some considerations for the sad ones who ask the way to the land of freeness… For by questions one can wander very far, and by questions one is directed to the way.”
The Soul begins with pastoral concern for “the sad ones” – those who are still bound to serve the virtues, but know that there is a higher state, a land of freeness and willing nothing (Chapter 57). She acknowledges her own past ignorance, positioning herself as once one of them, thereby grounding her authority in experience. The act of questioning becomes a double-edged sword: it can mislead or guide, depending on the disposition of the seeker. This signals a turning point, where the narrative shifts from mystical heights to a compassionate pedagogy for those beginning the path.
2. “I asked, first of all, in my thought, why Jesus Christ said to His Apostles: ‘It is necessary that I go away; and if I do not go away, you cannot truly receive the Holy Spirit.'”
The Soul’s first inquiry concerns a key scriptural moment-the departure of Christ and the coming of the Holy Spirit. This choice underscores the theme of spiritual maturation. The Apostles, like many today, are still in an early stage of attachment and are not yet disposed to receive the fullness of divine indwelling. The Soul models how to read Scripture contemplatively, with inner questioning leading to insight.
3. “Righteousness… told me that Jesus Christ said this to them because they loved Him too tenderly according to human nature, and feebly according to His divine nature.”
Here we receive the mystical interpretation: the Apostles’ love, though genuine, was too grounded in the affections of nature and not yet elevated into pure, divine love. Christ’s departure is necessary not because of absence, but to detach them from sentimental clinging and make space for a deeper, interior union with the Spirit. This reflects the text’s broader spiritual doctrine: divine love requires the purgation of natural attachments, even to holy persons or things.
4. “The truth of hearing this was both grievous and strange to them… for thus were they gross in their love. Nevertheless, they still possessed the sweet grace of God.”
Their reaction-grief and confusion-is not condemned but presented as a necessary purification. The Soul affirms that God’s grace remains with them even in this imperfect love, emphasizing God’s gentleness. The “grossness” is not sin but immaturity. This is consistent with the Soul’s overall pedagogical tone: consoling but demanding, calling for detachment without rejecting those not yet detached.
5. “[Such love] impedes the gifts of the Holy Spirit, [gifts] which can sustain only divine love, which is pure, without mingling from nature.”
The conclusion clarifies the spiritual consequence of human affection: while it does not sever one from grace, it obstructs the Spirit’s deeper work. Divine love must be unmixed with natural inclination to fully receive the Spirit’s gifts. This underscores a central teaching of the book: transformation requires purification not just from sin, but from all that is “mingled,” even good and pious emotions if they are not surrendered to divine ordering.
This chapter begins a new didactic section, where the Soul offers concrete meditations to those earlier in the spiritual path. She begins by interpreting Scripture with a mystical lens, revealing how divine love surpasses even holy natural affections and prepares the soul for pure union with God.
—
1. Why does the Soul begin speaking of “considerations,” and who are they intended for?
The Soul introduces “considerations” as a form of spiritual guidance for those who are still “sad” or seeking the “way to the land of freeness.” These are souls still bound in service to the virtues, but know of, and long for, a higher spiritual state – just as the Soul herself once did. By offering these reflections, she hopes to help them endure, find the path, and understand the stages of spiritual growth. She emphasizes that questioning, while potentially misleading, can also direct the soul back toward God when properly guided.
2. What is the Soul’s first question in this chapter, and what scriptural moment does it reference?
The Soul asks why Jesus told His Apostles: “It is necessary that I go away; and if I do not go away, you cannot truly receive the Holy Spirit.” This refers to a moment in the Gospel of John (John 16:7), where Christ explains the necessity of His departure for the coming of the Paraclete. The Soul uses this moment to introduce a key mystical insight about divine love and the purgation of natural affections.
3. What answer does the Soul receive from Righteousness regarding Jesus’ words?
Righteousness tells the Soul that Jesus spoke this way because the Apostles loved Him “too tenderly according to human nature” and “feebly according to His divine nature.” Their love, though sincere, was grounded in natural affection, which impeded their openness to receiving the Holy Spirit. Jesus’ departure was necessary to wean them from clinging to His physical presence so that they might receive divine love in a more interior and pure form.
4. How does the Soul interpret the Apostles’ grief and confusion at Christ’s words?
The Soul sees the Apostles’ grief and confusion not as a flaw of sin but as a mark of their spiritual immaturity. Their grief was “grievous and strange” to them because they could not yet understand the spiritual necessity of Christ’s absence. This reaction highlights the difference between natural and divine love. Nevertheless, the Soul insists they still possessed the “sweet grace of God,” affirming that even imperfect love does not exclude one from grace.
5. According to the Soul, what effect does natural love have on the reception of the Holy Spirit?
Natural love-rooted in emotional or sentimental attachment-does not sever the soul from God’s grace but impedes the reception of the Holy Spirit’s gifts. These gifts can only be fully received through pure divine love, which is free from “mingling from nature.” Thus, a soul must be purified of even good but merely natural affection in order to receive the Spirit’s transformative presence in full.
6. What broader spiritual principle is illustrated by the Apostles’ example, according to the Soul?
The broader principle is that spiritual growth involves a detachment even from holy and natural affections in order to make room for the indwelling of divine love. The Apostles, though close to Christ, still had to undergo a purgation of their too-human love in order to receive the Holy Spirit. This mirrors the spiritual journey of every soul: from natural devotion to the pure, unmixed love that God alone gives and sustains.
This chapter is an invitation to contemplation for those still beginning their journey toward divine freedom. It teaches that while natural love and affection are not sinful, they must ultimately yield to a purer love if the soul is to receive the fullness of the Holy Spirit’s gifts.
——————–
In Chapter 124, Porete presents Mary Magdalene as the exemplar of the soul’s journey from active love to contemplative union, using the metaphor of tilling and sowing a field to depict the necessary human labor in the spiritual life. Mary labors through acts of penance and pure intention, cultivating her “earth” (her body and soul) with devotion and the desire for God. Yet this work, though good, remains marked by the “sin of deficiency”-a necessary stage where the soul is still active in itself. True fruitfulness comes only when this labor ceases, when the soul surrenders all striving and rests in divine love. At that point, God alone acts within her, bringing about the hundredfold increase not through her, but in her, and for her. The chapter teaches that spiritual maturity lies in passing through the limits of self-willed goodness into the stillness where God’s love can work freely and unopposed, as seen in Mary when she is no longer seeking but resting in silent union.
—
1. “Next, I considered the sweet Magdalene … But she did this for the sake of nothingness … to love Him was accorded only to [Mary].”
Mary Magdalene’s love was not driven by any need or external compulsion, but arose from a pure, selfless desire to love Jesus in freedom. Her hospitality and devotion were acts of spiritual nobility, not servitude. This sets up the central contrast of the chapter: action driven by divine love versus action constrained by obligation or desire for results.
2. “Mary sought the true Sun who created the angels, and thus she could not receive comfort from the angels.”
Mary’s longing was so centered on Christ Himself that even the appearance of angels could not console her. This illustrates the soul’s movement beyond secondary goods-even holy ones-toward union with God alone, a divine dissatisfaction that refuses anything less than the Source.
3. “Ah, Mary! Who were you when you sought and loved humanly … Who were you … when you no longer sought but were united in the divine love …”
Porete contrasts two phases of Mary’s spiritual journey: one characterized by human affection and seeking, and another marked by union and rest in divine love. The turning point is not effort but transformation through grace-Mary moves from restless yearning to repose in being.
4. “For she sowed wheat there, without mingling anything … her master made this bear fruit one hundredfold … Mary rested without doing any work of herself, and God accomplished His part gently in Mary, for Mary’s sake, without Mary.”
Mary cultivates her soul (likened to land) through ascetic work and pure intention, but fruitfulness comes only when she stops working and lets God act within her. This image of the soul as a field highlights the necessity of human cooperation up to a point-then the soul must become passive, receptive, and empty for divine operation to take place.
5. “It is important that the wheat decay in the earth before there can be any new fruit … no one knows but God who alone does this work …”
Fruitfulness requires a kind of death: the grain must decay, just as the soul must be stripped of self-will and activity. This mystery-how grace multiplies and produces divine life-is hidden from all but God. The soul must entrust the process entirely to Him after doing her part.
6. “The earth which Mary worked was her body … by which she worked the earth of herself … to yield the true seed of God’s grace.”
Mary’s spiritual labor includes ascetic practices that discipline the body, purify desire, and ready the soul to receive God’s grace. The “true seed” of grace can only grow in a soil that has been tilled-signifying a life of purity, devotion, and inner intention without mixture.
7. “Now you have heard how Mary worked … now I will tell you about the wheat … it was the pure intention which she had directed toward God.”
Porete emphasizes that the value of Mary’s actions lies in her pure intention toward God. Without this, even great works are empty. With it, even the smallest acts are fertile soil for divine transformation. It is not effort but intention that sows the seed of divine life.
8. “These two works we must do because of our sin of deficiency, but beyond this our labor cannot penetrate, and thus it is necessary that God do the rest.”
Because of original and personal sin, humans must first labor in spiritual discipline. But no amount of effort alone leads to perfection. Beyond human striving lies divine initiative. The soul must come to an end of its own capacity before God’s transformative grace can act.
9. “For insofar as we have in us works of goodness … we cannot have along with it the gentle divine being, for He cannot dwell with this; He is too great to have a strange guest dwell with Him.”
Even “goodness” can become an obstacle if it remains self-directed or clings to self-merit. The divine being requires an empty soul, free even from attachment to virtue. This radical teaching warns against mistaking religious works for union with God.
10. “Mary thus attained the course of her being not when she was speaking and seeking, but when she was silent and at rest.”
Mary Magdalene reaches the fullness of her vocation not through activity, but through contemplative stillness. The path of divine union ends in rest-silence, surrender, and receptivity become the highest form of love. God’s work is completed when the soul stops striving and becomes wholly His.
This chapter is one of Porete’s most profound meditations on the balance of active and passive cooperation with grace. It emphasizes the necessity of initial labor-asceticism, intention, virtue-but culminates in a radical letting go, where divine love alone acts in the soul.
—
1. What motivates Mary Magdalene’s acts of hospitality and love toward Jesus, and how does Porete interpret their significance?
Porete emphasizes that Mary Magdalene’s actions were not motivated by Jesus’ bodily needs or social expectations but were done “for the sake of nothingness”-that is, out of pure, disinterested love. Her love was not a response to need or obligation but a voluntary gift flowing from divine affection. She allowed Martha to care for Jesus’ physical needs, but Mary chose “to love Him,” which Porete identifies as the higher path. This demonstrates a mystical insight: the truest service is not merely material help but pure, contemplative union grounded in love alone.
2. Why does Mary receive no comfort from the angels at the tomb, and what does this signify spiritually?
Mary’s refusal of comfort from the angels reveals her radical longing for Christ Himself, not merely for spiritual consolations or intermediaries. She was seeking the “true Sun who created the angels,” and anything less-no matter how holy-could not satisfy her. Porete uses this to show that the soul, when consumed by divine love, becomes indifferent to secondary goods. The angels, representing spiritual consolation, are shadows compared to the direct experience of God. This stage marks a transition from seeking God through created means to desiring Him alone, purely and absolutely.
3. How does Porete explain Mary’s spiritual labor using the metaphor of farming?
Porete likens Mary’s spiritual efforts to a farmer tilling land and sowing seed. The “earth” is her body, which she disciplines through penance and good works. The “seed” she sows is the pure intention directed solely toward God. The farmer must prepare the soil and sow, but cannot make the seed bear fruit-this is left to God’s power. Similarly, Mary must labor in virtue and intention, but true spiritual fruit-the hundredfold increase-comes only when she ceases from her own efforts and rests, allowing God to act in her. This illustrates the interplay between human cooperation and divine initiative.
4. What does Porete mean by “the sin of deficiency,” and how does it relate to even good works?
“The sin of deficiency” refers to the limitations of the soul’s initial efforts in the spiritual life, even when those efforts appear virtuous. Good works done from self-will, even with pure intentions, still fall short of divine union because they arise from the soul’s own activity rather than God’s. These works are necessary to begin the path, but they remain “deficient” because they do not yet embody divine being. Perfection requires the soul to be stripped even of the self in its virtues. Thus, these early efforts are called “sin” not in the moral sense, but as a necessary imperfection that must be transcended.
5. Why must the wheat “decay” in the earth before bearing fruit, and what does this represent spiritually?
The decay of the wheat signifies the death of self-will and self-activity in the spiritual path. Just as literal grain must die to yield new life, the soul must be emptied of its own striving, intentions, and images of God to become fertile ground for divine life. This dying is mysterious and can only be accomplished by God. Porete insists that after the soul has done all it can (tilling and sowing), it must stop, surrender, and rest-only then can God act freely and produce fruit “one hundredfold.” This marks the transition from active to contemplative life.
6. What role does pure intention play in Mary’s spiritual labor, and why is it emphasized?
Pure intention is the seed of all true spiritual fruit in Porete’s theology. It is the soul’s single-hearted direction toward God, untainted by self-interest or mixed motives. Mary’s entire labor, despite being rooted in bodily and mental effort, gains its true value from her unwavering intention to love and serve God alone. Even the most arduous acts are spiritually barren without such intention, while even simple acts become rich with meaning when offered purely. This focus on intention reflects Porete’s insistence that what matters is not the deed itself but the love that animates it.
7. How does Porete describe the point at which Mary becomes unencumbered of herself, and why is this important?
Mary becomes unencumbered of herself only after she has completed her necessary labor and rests completely in God’s will. At that point, she ceases all self-driven effort, holds on to nothing, and allows God to act in her without resistance. This state of “repose” is essential for divine union, which cannot coexist with even the noblest forms of self-activity. Mary’s example teaches that divine life begins not with doing, but with surrender. The soul must be emptied of itself-even of its own virtue and spiritual striving-to become the vessel of God’s pure activity.
8. What does Porete mean when she says Mary “attained the course of her being” not by seeking, but by resting?
Porete underscores that Mary reaches her true identity-not through seeking or active longing-but through silence, receptivity, and rest. “The course of her being” refers to the fulfillment of her vocation and union with God. This occurs not in exertion, but in surrender, when divine love alone acts in her. Seeking implies desire and separation; resting implies union and presence. Mary’s transformation is complete when she no longer seeks Christ externally but is interiorly united with Him in the quiet fullness of being.
——————–
In chapter 125, Porete presents Saint John the Baptist as the model of supreme sanctity because of his complete detachment, humility, and receptivity to Divine Goodness. Though sanctified from the womb and granted extraordinary experiences-such as baptizing Christ and witnessing the Trinity-John neither sought these gifts nor took pride in them. He remained silent, hidden, and faithful to his calling without clinging to Jesus even in His human presence, content to let God act in him without interference. His lack of self-concern and refusal to seek even spiritual consolation reflect the perfection of the contemplative life: a soul so possessed by God that it neither strives outwardly nor attaches inwardly, but rests entirely in God’s will, allowing divine love to accomplish its work in stillness and purity.
—
1. “Next I considered the supreme saint, that is the very sweet Baptist, and how he was sanctified in the womb of his mother, though it was not of concern to him.”
Porete begins with a reflection on Saint John the Baptist’s sanctification even before birth-an action entirely divine and independent of John’s own will or awareness. This introduces the theme of passive receptivity to divine grace, which contrasts with the more active seeking present in earlier spiritual stages. John exemplifies the soul that is holy without striving, sanctified by divine initiative alone.
2. “And I pondered in my amazement why it was that he showed Jesus Christ to two of his disciples so that they might follow him, and yet he remained completely quiet.”
John redirects his disciples to Christ, but does not himself pursue Christ. This silence is not indifference but a profound stillness rooted in interior union with God. Porete marvels at this paradox: John, the forerunner, does not follow Jesus in his visible humanity. His stillness reveals a contemplative posture beyond external devotion, embodying pure fidelity to divine will.
3. “One cannot find that Saint John left the desert to go see Jesus Christ in human nature. This was sufficient to his status without his seeking Him.”
John’s refusal to seek out Jesus physically suggests a spiritual state beyond the need for tangible signs. His solitude is not a rejection of Christ, but a sign of completion: he dwells in a union that does not require external movement. The desert here symbolizes the interior space where God acts freely, without the soul’s interference.
4. “Divine Goodness accomplished Her works in him, Goodness who satisfied him without impeding him by seeking the humanity [of Christ].”
Porete highlights the feminine aspect of Divine Goodness, which both fills and restrains the soul. In John, divine action completes its purpose without being diverted by sensory devotion to Christ’s humanity. The emphasis is on the sufficiency of divine grace: it fulfills the soul without stirring restless pursuit.
5. “John kept himself from holding onto Jesus Christ in his human person, and from following him.”
Even when Christ approached him, John refrains from attaching himself to the visible, tangible Christ. This restraint indicates an interior freedom: the detachment needed for the soul to be wholly given to God without clinging to even holy consolations.
6. “So much had the divinity taken over his intention.”
John’s will is fully overtaken by divine intent. There is no mingling of human affection or ambition. This reflects the height of spiritual union: not only does the soul surrender to God, but its very intention becomes divine. John becomes an instrument whose only motive is God’s own.
7. “He held God the Son, and so he heard the voice of the Father and so he saw also the Holy Spirit.”
In baptizing Christ, John experiences the full manifestation of the Trinity. Yet his experience is not for personal exaltation. He does not publicize or cling to it; he is content to serve and remain hidden. Porete emphasizes that divine intimacy does not always manifest in outward glory but often in humility and hiddenness.
8. “Did he not hide it? Did he take pride in himself in this? Not at all. He had no concern about it except to please the One who accomplished such a work by His goodness.”
John’s humility crowns his sanctity. He neither boasts of divine favor nor centers his identity around his spiritual privileges. His only concern is to please God who acted through him. This marks the perfection of simplicity: no self-interest, no attachment to status, only pure orientation to divine pleasure.
Conclusion:
This chapter presents John the Baptist as the model of the soul fully possessed by God. Unlike those who seek signs or labor for spiritual progress, John rests in what God has done without anxiety or striving. He redirects others to Christ, but remains hidden himself, content to be the silent witness. His life illustrates the ultimate humility and receptivity in union, where divine action fulfills the soul without noise, ambition, or grasping.
—
1. Why does Porete describe Saint John the Baptist as “the supreme saint,” and what does this imply about his spiritual state?
Porete calls Saint John “the supreme saint” because of his unparalleled humility, divine union, and receptivity to God’s action. His sanctification in the womb, which occurred without his own striving, signals a soul entirely formed by grace. He lives in perfect surrender, embodying the highest form of contemplative life: one that neither seeks consolation nor grasps for experience, but rests in God’s will and acts only as God directs. His greatness lies in this complete dispossession and divine absorption.
2. What is the significance of John directing his disciples to Jesus while remaining silent and still himself?
John’s redirection of his disciples to Jesus while personally remaining silent and motionless illustrates his spiritual detachment. He plays his role as forerunner without clinging to his followers, refusing even to seek Christ in His visible humanity. This restraint highlights John’s radical self-effacement and his contentment in invisibility. It also shows that his love for God is free of possessiveness. He points the way for others but does not interfere with the divine action in his own soul by externalizing his devotion.
3. Why, according to Porete, did John never seek out Jesus in His human nature, and what does this reveal about his relationship with God?
Porete explains that John did not need to seek out Jesus in His humanity because Divine Goodness fully satisfied him without such seeking. His relationship with God was interior, spiritual, and complete-he was already united with the divine will. This reveals a depth of union where the soul is fed not by images, consolations, or even direct human contact with Christ, but solely by God’s inner working. John embodies a pure receptivity where no outward sign is necessary.
4. How does Porete interpret John’s refusal to cling to Jesus even when they were in direct contact during the baptism?
John’s refusal to cling to Jesus during the baptism is not coldness but the expression of a soul that has completely transcended self-interest. Though he physically holds Christ, hears the Father, and sees the Holy Spirit, he does not boast, possess, or even disclose the experience. He remains inwardly detached, giving all glory to God and taking no satisfaction for himself. This points to a sanctity that is hidden, humble, and purely oriented to God’s pleasure-not personal gain.
5. What is the spiritual lesson Porete draws from John’s complete indifference to the extraordinary graces he experienced?
The key lesson is that the highest spiritual maturity involves no attachment even to extraordinary spiritual experiences. John does not revel in his unique grace of witnessing the Trinity, nor does he publicize it or center his identity around it. He is entirely void of spiritual pride. Porete presents this as the ultimate sign of divine union: the soul no longer seeks anything for itself, not even the knowledge or affirmation of its own sanctity, but is fully content to let God work in silence.
6. How does this chapter contribute to Porete’s larger teaching on spiritual union and divine freedom?
This chapter reinforces Porete’s core teaching that union with God involves radical humility, silence, and the cessation of self-will. John the Baptist’s example shows that divine union is not about intense spiritual activity, seeking, or emotional attachment, but about being acted upon by Divine Goodness. The soul that reaches this point no longer asks, seeks, or holds on, but allows God to accomplish His will in and through it without interference. John’s life becomes a template for the soul that has moved beyond even holy desire to a state of total receptivity.
7. Why is it significant that Porete does not describe John as seeking Jesus, but rather Jesus as seeking John?
This inversion reflects the essence of divine election and spiritual rest. John does not go in search of Christ; Christ comes to him. This passive stance underscores the contemplative soul’s freedom from striving. The initiative belongs entirely to God. It reveals the mystery that in the highest states of spiritual life, it is not we who seek God, but God who seeks, finds, and transforms us. John, resting in the desert, becomes the symbol of the soul that awaits and receives without demand.
——————–
In chapter 126, Marguerite Porete reflects on the Virgin Mary as the supreme exemplar of divine receptivity, humility, and love. Mary neither clung to nor displayed her perfect sanctity, embodying a selfless detachment from all personal claim to grace. Her virginity is presented as the unwavering integrity of her will, so attuned to divine goodness that she would not abandon it even for the world’s salvation-knowing that Christ’s Passion alone sufficed. Porete portrays Mary’s conception of Christ as the moment of highest spiritual illumination in creation, surpassing even the saints in glory. At the foot of the Cross, Mary’s compassion reached its pinnacle, as she desired pardon for Christ’s executioners and would have offered her own life for them if needed. This meditation culminates in awe at Christ’s abundant and ineffable suffering-more intense than all human anguish combined-which causes the soul to be drawn out of itself to live wholly by divine love, as Mary did.
—
1. “Next I pondered the sweet Virgin Mary, who was so perfectly sanctified. To whom did she show it, or reveal it, or [from whom did she] hide it? No one. She had no concern on account of such a work, nor did she hold on to it.”
Mary’s sanctity was not self-reflective or self-proclaimed. Her perfection was entirely hidden in humility. Porete underscores the Virgin’s utter self-forgetfulness: she neither exhibited nor clung to her sanctity. This illustrates the model of annihilated being, where sanctity exists without egoic attachment or awareness-Mary is the mirror of the soul perfectly surrendered.
2. “If the whole world were to be saved by her mediation in return for her withdrawing from her status of virginity, she would never consent to it…”
Porete presents Mary as unwavering in her singular dedication to divine purity. Even the salvation of the world could not tempt her from what she was called to be. This is not stubbornness but perfect alignment with divine will. Virginity here is not merely physical but symbolic of interior singularity and undivided love.
3. “She had in this moment more understanding and love and praise of the divine Trinity than all those who are in glory, except her.”
Porete exalts Mary’s interior life at the moment of the Incarnation as surpassing all created spiritual glory. Her union with the Trinity is not just one of grace but of direct knowledge and ecstatic love. She is the one soul who most perfectly receives and responds to God, making her the paradigm of divine-human communion.
4. “Lady, He could only be what you were, and so He could not be what you were not.”
This bold statement expresses the necessity of Mary’s perfection: Christ’s humanity could only be received from a vessel completely prepared and untainted. Porete emphasizes that Mary’s being was already so divinely aligned that nothing of imperfection could enter the Incarnation through her.
5. “If there were need of it, you would have in this hour given your life so that they would have had pardon from God for this evil deed.”
Porete imagines Mary’s perfect charity at the Cross-not only does she endure the unspeakable sorrow of witnessing her Son’s death, but she would have offered her life for the very ones who crucified Him. This reveals the heights of her selfless love, mirroring Christ’s own redemptive love.
6. “The amount of His blessed blood which one could put on the point of a pin would have been sufficient for redeeming one hundred thousand worlds… yet nevertheless He gave it in so great abundance that none remained in Him.”
Here Porete emphasizes the superabundance of Christ’s love and suffering. While the smallest drop of His blood suffices, He gives all-excessively and gratuitously. This is divine generosity beyond measure. Mary’s response, her silent and sorrowful participation, is thus grounded in this same logic of gratuitous, total self-gift.
7. “All the sufferings… from the time of Adam up until the time of the Antichrist… still would not be but one point of suffering compared to the suffering which Jesus Christ had…”
Porete concludes with a meditation on the immeasurable agony of Christ’s Passion, which surpasses all human suffering in intensity and dignity. This immense pain-freely endured-is the measure of divine love. Mary’s contemplation of this suffering leads the author to a mystical departure from self, living henceforth only by divine pleasure.
This chapter encapsulates Mary as the archetype of pure receptivity, hidden sanctity, and perfect conformity to divine will. Her humility, unshakable purity, and silent consent even at the Cross make her the supreme human example of the soul emptied of self so that God may fully dwell.
—
1. What does Porete emphasize about Mary’s sanctity and her attitude toward it?
Porete emphasizes that Mary was perfectly sanctified yet showed no concern for demonstrating or claiming this sanctity. She neither revealed nor concealed it, nor did she hold onto it as something self-possessed. This reveals her utter humility and detachment from any self-regard-even for her own holiness. She simply was sanctified, without the interference of ego, making her the model of pure receptivity and self-emptying.
2. How does Porete portray Mary’s virginity in relation to her identity and mission?
Mary’s virginity is portrayed not merely as physical integrity but as spiritual and ontological integrity-total wholeness and singleness of will. Porete insists that Mary would never relinquish this status, even if the salvation of the whole world depended on it, because her identity was so singularly aligned with God’s will. However, this is not obstinacy, but rather a recognition that salvation does not require compromise, since Christ’s own passion is sufficient.
3. What does Porete say about Mary’s understanding at the moment of the Incarnation?
At the moment of conceiving Jesus through the Holy Spirit, Mary had, according to Porete, more love, understanding, and praise of the Trinity than all the saints and angels in glory-excluding herself in her glorified state. This profound insight reflects Mary’s unique and unparalleled union with the divine at that moment, making her the most spiritually illumined creature in creation.
4. How does Porete compare John the Baptist’s sanctity with Mary’s?
Porete acknowledges the greatness of John the Baptist, saying he was more filled with divine light in the womb than even the Apostles were at Pentecost. Yet she emphasizes that he was still in need compared to Mary. Mary was so fully perfected and divinely disposed that Christ could only become man through her; He “could only be what she was,” meaning she had to be utterly free of all deficiency for the Incarnation to occur.
5. What is Mary’s role at the foot of the Cross, and how does Porete describe her reaction?
Mary, fully aware of Christ’s innocence and the injustice of His execution, does not respond with bitterness or vengeance. Instead, Porete presents her as so full of love and charity that, had it been necessary, she would have willingly died to secure forgiveness for Christ’s killers. This act, though not required due to Christ’s sufficiency, reveals the totality of her maternal and spiritual love, even for enemies.
6. What does Porete teach about the abundance and anguish of Christ’s Passion?
Porete asserts that a single drop of Christ’s blood could have redeemed countless worlds, but He gave all of Himself, down to the last drop, out of love. The Passion was not only sufficient but excessive in its sacrificial abundance. Furthermore, the suffering of Christ-because of His supreme purity-was greater than all sufferings of history combined. This underscores the immeasurable cost and love involved in redemption.
7. What effect does contemplating Mary and Christ’s suffering have on the author?
Contemplating Mary’s sanctity and Christ’s Passion leads Porete to a mystical self-transcendence. She is “made to depart from herself” so that she might live according to divine pleasure rather than her own selfhood. This is a hallmark of her spiritual theology: the annihilation of the self so that divine love alone may live and act in the soul.
——————–
In chapter 127, Marguerite Porete meditates on the unfathomable mystery of the Incarnation-how divine nature is united with human nature in the person of the Son-not as a marvel of suffering alone, but as the supreme expression of divine love and humility. She emphasizes that this union is beyond anything humanity could have dared to request or imagine, and that its contemplation has the power to free the soul entirely from self if it consents to God’s transforming action. However, she confesses her own failure to yield fully to this grace, revealing that fear and attachment to self blocked the divine work. Thus, the chapter teaches that true union with God is not achieved through one’s own thoughts or efforts, but only through surrender, allowing divine Righteousness to act within and undo the soul’s self-will.
—
1. “After this, I pondered how the divine nature is joined for our sake to human nature in the person of God the Son. O true God, who is the one who could sufficiently ponder this?”
Marguerite begins in awestruck contemplation of the Incarnation-the mysterious union of divine and human natures in Christ. This mystery surpasses the intellect; it is not something that can be fully grasped by human reason. The rhetorical question emphasizes the ineffable excess of God’s love and humility in becoming man. Her tone conveys reverence and holy wonder.
2. “Who is so audacious to dare to ask or to seek it if His goodness itself had not accomplished it?”
The Incarnation is not something humanity could presume to request or even imagine; it is entirely an initiative of divine Goodness. Porete underscores that this act was a gratuitous self-gift of God, not merited or conceived by any creature. God’s initiative highlights the boundless nature of divine love, which moves beyond all fittingness or comprehension.
3. “If Jesus Christ was poor and despised and tormented for our sakes, this is not a marvel. He could not be held by it, having received the overpowering love by which He loved us, since He had the humanity by which He could do this.”
Christ’s suffering is, in Marguerite’s view, understandable given His human nature and divine love. While awe-inspiring, it does not astonish her as much as the Incarnation itself, because the humanity of Christ made suffering possible. His love made it inevitable. This distinguishes Christ’s Passion as a consequence of the Incarnation, which itself is the deeper mystery.
4. “But to say that divine nature took on human nature in joining it in the person of the Son, who is the one who would dare to ask for such an excess?”
Marguerite returns to the scandal and shock of the Incarnation: not only did Christ suffer for us, but God Himself-Infinite Being-entered into finite, contingent flesh. She calls this an “excess,” pointing to the extravagance and unthinkable humility of divine condescension. No one would have dared ask for this; it is a pure gift of divine generosity.
5. “In this there is enough to ponder in order to be eternally unencumbered of ourselves, if we would allow Righteousness to work in us.”
Here she pivots to the spiritual consequence: contemplation of the Incarnation has the power to detach the soul entirely from itself. If one truly reflects on it and allows divine Justice or Righteousness to act, the self will be lost in the love and majesty of God. The Incarnation is not only a doctrine to believe but a path to self-transcendence.
6. “Alas, I have not left this work for Him [to do]! For if I had allowed Him to do what was pleasing to Him, He would have freed me as soon as He gave me this thought about Himself.”
Porete laments her resistance to divine action. She recognizes that the grace of divine contemplation was offered to her, but she clung to self-will and thus prevented God from completing His liberating work. Her confession reveals a deep awareness of the tension between divine initiative and human resistance.
7. “But I did not wish that He heal the fear of such a loss [of myself]. My thoughts have made me follow many false steps: I think to find Him by my works, but I will not accomplish it, nor do I accomplish it, except through loss.”
This final admission echoes one of Porete’s core themes: the soul’s union with God is not achieved through effort or merit, but through loss-the radical relinquishment of self. She critiques the impulse to “do” or “achieve” union by works, acknowledging that her own fear of self-loss held her back. Only when the soul consents to be undone by divine love can true union occur.
—
1. What central mystery does the soul contemplate in this chapter, and why does it provoke such awe?
The soul contemplates the mystery of the Incarnation-the union of divine nature with human nature in the person of the Son of God. This provokes profound awe because it is a mystery far beyond human understanding or expectation. No one could have dared to request or even imagine such a union; it is an excessive gift of divine Goodness. The soul is struck by the unfathomable humility of God in condescending to take on human flesh, not merely to suffer, but to unite Himself to creation in a personal, intimate way.
2. How does Marguerite distinguish between the marvel of Christ’s suffering and the greater marvel of the Incarnation itself?
While Christ’s suffering for humanity is immense and full of love, Marguerite does not consider it as astonishing as the Incarnation. The reason is that Christ, having human nature, could suffer and be despised, and His divine love would naturally move Him to do so. However, the very act of divine nature taking on human nature-becoming flesh-is a far greater wonder. It is not merely an effect of love but a complete self-lowering by God that transcends all reason and expectation. This act alone, she says, is sufficient to detach the soul eternally from self if rightly pondered.
3. According to the author, what would have happened if she had fully consented to God’s will at the moment of insight into the Incarnation?
She states that if she had fully allowed God to act according to His pleasure when He first gave her this thought about the Incarnation, He would have immediately freed her from herself. That is, the contemplation would have led to total self-abandonment and union with God. However, she admits that she resisted, clinging to self and fear, and thus obstructed the work of divine Righteousness. Her confession highlights the importance of surrender in the spiritual journey-not merely receiving divine insight but allowing it to transform the soul through self-loss.
4. What spiritual error does she confess, and how does it relate to the theme of self-loss?
She confesses the error of trying to attain God through her own thoughts and works, rather than through surrender and loss of self. This is a core theme in her spirituality. Her attempts to “find Him by my works” are acknowledged as misguided, since union with God is not achieved by effort or merit but by relinquishing the self entirely. The fear of self-loss-of ceasing to be the autonomous “I”-is what holds her back. The true path is to let go and allow divine Love to do the work of transformation.
5. What does this chapter reveal about the relationship between divine initiative and human cooperation in the spiritual life?
This chapter reveals that divine initiative always comes first-God gives the insight, God initiates the union, God offers the transformation. Yet human cooperation is required: the soul must consent, must allow Righteousness to act, must let go of its own grasp. Marguerite shows that even the grace of contemplating the Incarnation can be blocked if the soul refuses to surrender its will. Cooperation, therefore, is not active striving but radical openness to being undone and remade by God’s love.
——————–
In Chapter 128, the soul meditates on the profound mystery of the suffering, poverty, and humiliating death of Jesus Christ, emphasizing that these acts were endured entirely out of love “for my sake.” This contemplation leads the soul to realize that even a single benefit from Christ’s Passion has greater power to ignite divine love than any imaginable cosmic destruction. The soul then hears from “Truth” that no one can behold the Trinity without being utterly free from sin, as Christ’s soul was from the moment of its creation. Because Christ’s soul was perfectly united to both divine and mortal nature without impediment, the soul recognizes that she too must be transformed by grace into a child of God in order to ascend. True union with God cannot be achieved through one’s own works but only through conformity to Christ’s will and purity, revealing that divine love is not earned but received through surrender and purification.
—
1. “After this, I pondered how He who was God and man was shamefully despised on earth for my sake, and [I pondered] the great poverty in which He placed Himself for my sake and the cruel death He suffered for my sake.”
Marguerite reflects intensely on the Incarnate Word’s self-emptying-His humiliation, poverty, and death-not as abstract theological facts, but as deeply personal actions done “for my sake.” The repetition underscores the interiorization of Christ’s Passion, transforming it into a direct and intimate relationship. The mystery of His suffering is not simply to be admired but internalized as an invitation to love in return.
2. “In these three facts and points are all His deeds contained without comprehension.”
Here Marguerite declares that the totality of Christ’s salvific work-His humiliation, poverty, and crucifixion-defies rational comprehension. Rather than being analyzable in detail, these mysteries form a kind of trinitarian cluster of divine self-giving that calls not for speculation but for adoration and transformation.
3. “It is a greater thing to inflame our hearts in love for you, in pondering only one of the benefits you have accomplished for our sake, than it would be if the whole world, heaven, and earth were engulfed in fire in order to destroy one body.”
This powerful hyperbole expresses the infinite worth of divine love and mercy. One act of Christ’s redemptive love is more worthy and transformative than even cosmic destruction. Love, not destruction, is the measure of true spiritual weight. Pondering Christ’s mercy is thus a path to union, far more profound than any apocalyptic awe.
4. “And then I pondered the purity of the Truth, who told me that I will not see the divine Trinity until my soul is without stain of sin, like [the soul] of Jesus Christ …”
Marguerite conveys a direct message from the Truth (Christ), linking spiritual vision of the Trinity to complete inner purification. The comparison to Christ’s soul at the moment of its creation emphasizes the absolute purity required for divine union. This reflects Marguerite’s mystical theology: the soul must be stripped of all attachment, all sin-even the subtlest stain of self-before it can gaze upon God.
5. “…which was glorified at the same point when she was created by the divine Trinity and joined to the mortal body and divine nature in the person of the Son.”
Marguerite stresses that the soul of Christ was from the very beginning perfect, glorified, and in union with both human and divine nature. This reveals both the exceptional dignity of Christ and the possibility held out for souls who are purified by grace. The soul must be like Christ’s-not just morally good, but divinely conformed.
6. “Then I pondered who it is who will ascend to heaven. And Truth told me that no one will ascend there except the one who descended from there, that is, the Son of God Himself.”
This recalls Christ’s words in John 3:13. Marguerite interprets it to mean that only those who are joined to the Son through divine grace can ascend-only those who, like Him, originate in the divine will. True ascent is not moral or human effort, but participation in the divine filiation granted by grace.
7. “This means that no one can ascend there except only those who are sons of God through divine grace.”
Spiritual ascent depends entirely on divine adoption. Marguerite is articulating a radical doctrine of deification: salvation is not simply being saved from sin, but being made a child of God, possessing divine nature by grace. Only those transfigured by this grace can enter into communion with the Trinity.
8. “And thus Jesus Christ Himself said that my brother, my sister, and my mother is the one who does the will of God my Father.”
Concluding with Christ’s own words, Marguerite underscores that divine sonship is not biological but spiritual-rooted in obedience to the divine will. Union with God is not a privilege of status, but of surrender. Doing God’s will is the family resemblance that marks the soul as Christ’s true kin.
This chapter weaves together Christ’s suffering, the mystery of His pure soul, and the conditions for divine union, presenting a vision of salvation that centers entirely on divine grace, radical transformation, and the soul’s total self-offering.
—
1. What three aspects of Christ’s earthly life does the soul focus on in this chapter, and why are they significant?
The soul contemplates three aspects of Christ’s earthly life:
* His shameful rejection and humiliation,
* His voluntary poverty, and
* His cruel death.
These three comprise the totality of Christ’s deeds “without comprehension”-that is, they surpass human understanding in their depth of love and divine purpose. They are not merely historical facts but eternal realities that reveal the immensity of divine charity. Christ’s suffering is portrayed as personally directed toward the soul-“for my sake”-inviting a reciprocal interior response of love, humility, and surrender.
2. How does the soul interpret the spiritual value of reflecting on Christ’s Passion compared to cosmic destruction?
The soul declares that pondering even one benefit Christ has done for us-particularly His Passion-has greater spiritual power to ignite love than if all heaven and earth were set ablaze to destroy a single body. This hyperbolic image conveys the incomparable value of Christ’s love, suggesting that divine love is more awe-inspiring and transformative than even the most violent or dramatic event imaginable. Reflection on the Passion is not a passive act but a spiritually explosive encounter with divine truth.
3. What does the soul learn from “Truth” about the vision of the Trinity, and how does it relate to the soul’s purity?
“Truth”-a personification of Christ-tells the soul that she will not see the Trinity until she is entirely without sin, just as Christ’s soul was at its creation. This implies that the beatific vision is reserved for those who have been made wholly pure, free from every stain. Since Christ’s soul was created already glorified and joined to both divine and human nature, it sets the standard for spiritual perfection. The soul realizes she must be conformed to this purity to be admitted into divine vision.
4. How does the soul describe the moment of Christ’s incarnation in relation to the perfection of His soul?
The soul affirms that Christ’s soul was glorified at the very instant of its creation and was immediately united to both mortal flesh and divine nature in the person of the Son. This moment is portrayed as one of absolute fullness, where nothing was lacking. The mortal body, though capable of suffering, did not diminish the soul’s perfection. This theological insight emphasizes Christ’s complete sanctity from the beginning and serves as a mystical blueprint for the kind of union the soul herself desires.
5. What does the soul learn about who may ascend to heaven, and how is this connected to divine sonship?
The soul hears from Truth that no one ascends to heaven except the one who has descended from there-namely, the Son of God. This is interpreted to mean that only those who become sons and daughters of God by divine grace can ascend. Entry into heaven is not based on natural capacity but on supernatural adoption: only those conformed to the Son, doing the will of the Father, are spiritually capable of rising to God. The quote from Christ about His true family-those who do the Father’s will-underscores this point.
6. How does this chapter reflect Marguerite Porete’s understanding of mystical union and self-loss?
The chapter reflects Porete’s core theme: that mystical union with God requires total self-loss, which comes not through works or self-effort, but through divine grace and conformity to Christ’s example. The soul realizes that pondering Christ’s suffering should liberate her from self-centeredness. True transformation happens when she ceases striving to find God through her own works and instead yields to God’s action in her. This is a spirituality of surrender rather than merit, rooted in the mystery of the Incarnation and Passion.
——————–
Chapter 129 teaches that the highest spiritual perfection, exemplified by the Seraphim, consists not in possessing particular divine gifts or understanding the works of God-such as the Incarnation-but in being wholly united to the divine will itself. The Seraphim possess nothing of their own except their full participation in the eternal willing of the divine will by the Trinity. This profound and simple union reveals the path for the human soul as well: to let go of self-concern and become “unencumbered” by conforming entirely to God’s will. The chapter concludes the seven considerations by presenting this contemplative surrender as the soul’s true transformation and consolation, especially for those weighed down by sorrow.
—
1. “Next, I considered the Seraphim, and I asked of them what thing it was about the works which Charity accomplished for them through the mystery of the Incarnation in the humanity of Jesus Christ.”
The soul turns contemplatively to the Seraphim-the highest angelic order associated with burning love-and seeks to understand what benefit they received through the Incarnation. This question is profound, for the Incarnation is primarily a redemptive act for humanity, and not for angels. The speaker is probing whether even the highest of beings were transformed by divine Love’s self-revelation in Christ.
2. ” …whether it was that the divine Trinity created them; or whether [the Trinity] will do eternally whatever [work] in the creature by [divine] goodness for the sake of the creature.”
Here the speaker ponders two alternatives: whether the greatest benefit for the Seraphim lies in their creation by the Trinity or in the eternal workings of divine goodness toward all creatures. This formulation reflects a deep theological sensitivity-recognizing both the origin and ongoing action of divine generosity.
3. “But Love told me that none of these was theirs except for one thing, and this thing is for the purpose of the divine willing of the divine will by the whole Trinity.”
The answer from Love is striking: the Seraphim claim no work or benefit for themselves except this one-the divine willing of the divine will. Their complete union lies not in any specific action done for them, but in being one with the divine volition itself. This describes a state of absolute surrender and harmony with God’s own desire, transcending any personal benefit or created work.
4. “And this is a sweet consideration, and profitable, which can unencumber the self in drawing near to the being which one ought to be.”
This realization-that the Seraphim live in perfect accord with the divine will-is not only doctrinally beautiful but also practically liberating for the soul. It suggests that to become what one “ought to be” requires letting go of one’s own striving and resting in the divine will. This “sweet consideration” offers spiritual consolation, especially for those burdened by sorrow or spiritual weight.
5. “Now we have seven considerations, which are fitting for those who are sad.”
The soul shifts from vision to pedagogy, presenting these seven contemplations for the sad ones who are still bound to the virtues, but long for the land of freeness where the Soul wills nothing (Chapter 57). Each contemplation reveals an aspect of divine love-from the Apostles to the Seraphim-that can uplift the sorrowful soul. The series concludes with the Seraphim precisely because their total self-emptying union with God epitomizes the goal toward which the soul must move: losing itself entirely in divine Love.
6. “The seventh concerns the Seraphim, how they are one in the divine will.”
The final summary reinforces the core insight: the highest joy and perfection consists not in receiving something from God, but in being one with His will. The Seraphim model this highest union-not through works, merit, or even understanding, but through pure love and consent to God’s being and desire.
This chapter encapsulates a mystical theology of total surrender: the Seraphim serve as luminous icons of what the soul is called to become-not active achievers but living flames of divine intention.
—
1. What question does the soul pose to the Seraphim regarding the mystery of the Incarnation?
The soul asks the Seraphim what benefit or work of Charity was accomplished for them through the mystery of the Incarnation in the humanity of Jesus Christ. This is a profound inquiry, since the Incarnation primarily concerns humanity, not angels. The soul wonders whether any of the works accomplished by God in this mystery-such as creation itself or God’s eternal works in creatures-belong to the Seraphim as a particular grace or possession.
2. How does “Love” respond to the soul’s question?
Love answers that none of these works-the creation of the Seraphim, nor God’s eternal works in creatures-belongs to them in the way the soul expects. Instead, what belongs to the Seraphim is one thing alone: the divine willing of the divine will by the whole Trinity. This means that their sole possession, so to speak, is their total union with and consent to God’s will. They exist in perfect alignment with divine intention, without self-seeking.
3. What is the significance of this “one thing” that the Seraphim possess?
This “one thing”-the divine willing of the divine will-is of supreme spiritual significance. It indicates that the Seraphim are not united to God by receiving specific works or benefits, but by participating wholly in God’s own will. Their union with God is not based on created grace or activity, but on an unmediated, pure conformity to divine intention. It is a model of the highest contemplative union, wherein selfhood is entirely surrendered in love.
4. Why is this consideration described as “sweet and profitable”?
It is described as “sweet” because it conveys a deep and peaceful truth about divine union that consoles and uplifts the soul. It is “profitable” because it offers practical spiritual guidance: namely, that the path to becoming what one “ought to be” involves being unburdened of self-will and becoming united to God’s will. In contemplating the Seraphim, the soul sees a reflection of its own final vocation: total participation in divine desire.
5. What is the role of the seven considerations in the spiritual life, according to the author?
The author says these seven considerations are “fitting for those who are sad”, those who are still in service to the virtues but long for the land of freeness. Each consideration reveals a different aspect of divine union – through figures such as the Apostles, the Virgin Mary, and finally the Seraphim – culminating in the ultimate example of self-emptying love. Together, they lead the soul from the land of sandness to the land of freeness where all self-will is annihilated.
6. What does the seventh consideration reveal about the nature of angelic perfection and how it relates to human sanctity?
The seventh consideration reveals that angelic perfection, particularly that of the Seraphim, consists in pure alignment with God’s will. They do not possess personal merits or distinct works but are perfected in love by being one with divine intention. This reveals that the highest form of sanctity-both angelic and human-is not based on action or achievement, but on self-surrender and union with God’s desire. For humans, this provides a contemplative ideal: to love God’s will so purely that one becomes transparent to it.
——————–
In Chapter 130 of The Mirror of Simple Souls, the Soul engages in a profound contemplation of the radical contrast between God and herself, arriving at a mystical understanding that true knowledge of the divine is inseparable from a deep recognition of her own misery. She meditates on God’s supreme power, wisdom, and goodness, confessing that she knows nothing of these except insofar as she knows her own weakness, ignorance, and wretchedness. The chapter expresses a spiritual paradox: that self-knowledge and God-knowledge are proportionally linked-one can only grasp the infinite glory of God to the extent that one sees one’s own nothingness. This dual awareness fosters a transformative humility that prepares the soul for union with God, not through comprehension but through surrender.
—
1. “Now I will tell you the considerations which I had in such a life, named above, that is, in the sad life, the time when I knew not how to restrain myself or how to endure.”
The soul situates this reflection within a period of spiritual desolation or trial – “the sad life” – a time when she was still in service to the virtues but longed for the higher spiritual state of willing nothing, the so-called land of freeness. This chapter arises from a deep interior struggle, and the reflections that follow emerge as a kind of medicine for the soul’s inability to “restrain” or “endure” this state. The soul is speaking from the perspective of one who has been humbled by suffering and disoriented by divine hiddenness.
2. “First I considered myself, and then I considered God, and I pondered how I willed great desires for His sake. I praised and delighted in these three things above all the others, and these considerations gave me the means to restrain myself and to endure.”
The soul turns inward first and then upward. Rather than being lost in introspection, she uses this double movement of contemplation to deepen her relationship with God. The “three things” are unnamed here but become evident in what follows: power, wisdom, and goodness-both divine and humanly inverted. This contemplation of opposites becomes her source of endurance and discipline, not in self-assertion, but in accepting her dependence and emptiness.
3. “Lord God, I do not know whence you are… what you are… who you are… for only your supreme divine eternal power… wisdom… goodness comprehends this.”
The soul articulates the unknowability of God: His origin, essence, and identity are shrouded in divine transcendence. Each aspect of God’s being-power, wisdom, and goodness-is beyond created comprehension, known only by God Himself. This Trinitarian echo sets the framework for the contrast with the soul’s own limitations and introduces the rhetorical balance that structures the rest of the chapter.
4. “I do not know whence I am… what I am… who I am… your power… wisdom… goodness comprehends this.”
The soul mirrors the divine unknowability with her own mystery. But whereas God’s mystery is majestic and infinite in excellence, hers is a mystery of lack-her origin, nature, and identity are shrouded not in glory but in weakness and insufficiency. She can only know herself as God knows her, underscoring her utter dependence on divine knowledge.
5. “Lord, I know not whence you are… I know not what you are… I know not who you are…”
The soul moves from a formal structure into a more plaintive repetition. She doesn’t merely state God is unknowable-she feels it. Her repeated “I know not” becomes a spiritual lament and confession, not of failure but of reverent awe. She acknowledges the abyss between her perception and divine reality.
6. “Lord, I know not whence I am… what I am… who I am… for I know nothing of my excessive weakness… ignorance… wretchedness.”
This triplet affirms the soul’s radical poverty. Just as she cannot comprehend God because of His transcendence, she cannot comprehend herself because of her depth of fallenness. Her sinfulness is not just moral but metaphysical-her very being is shaped by lack and infirmity. The balance between divine greatness and human misery becomes clearer and sharper.
7. “Lord, you are One Goodness… I am One Wretchedness… Lord, you are… and I am not…”
Here the chapter reaches its most direct and uncompromising contrast: God as total Being and Goodness, the soul as total Non-being and Wretchedness. This is not nihilism, but mystical realism-an acknowledgment that the soul’s only true being is in God. Apart from Him, she is not only sinful but ontologically void.
8. “Lord, you are all power, all wisdom, and all goodness… and I am all weakness, all ignorance, and all wretchedness…”
A Trinitarian inversion continues: divine attributes versus human miseries. The rhythm of this opposition serves a purgative function-emptying the soul of any self-reliance or pride. She is unworthy and knows it deeply, but in that recognition, a certain clarity is born: the greatness of God is seen precisely in contrast to the soul’s own smallness.
9. “Lord, you are one sole God in three persons… and I am one sole enemy, in three miseries…”
The author’s most daring inversion: she contrasts the Holy Trinity with her own “unholy trinity” of weakness, ignorance, and wretchedness. This radical confession frames her as God’s enemy-not by choice, but by condition. It is theologically sobering and mystically honest: unless God intervenes, the soul remains trapped in this triple misery.
10. “Lord, how much do I comprehend of your power… wisdom… goodness? Only as much as I comprehend of my weakness… ignorance… wretchedness.”
The soul affirms a spiritual principle of proportionality: one can know God only to the extent that one knows oneself, and vice versa. This echoes classical Christian mysticism (e.g., Augustine, Bernard), where humility is the foundation of spiritual knowledge. Self-knowledge and God-knowledge are mutually deepening.
11. “If I could comprehend your goodness, I would comprehend my wretchedness… And if I could comprehend my wretchedness, I would comprehend your goodness…”
This is the heart of the paradox. The soul’s descent into self-knowledge is not a detour from divine knowledge but its gateway. True humility is not psychological self-loathing, but theological clarity. The more one sees one’s own nothingness, the more one beholds the all-sufficiency of God.
12. “This is so little that one could say better that this is nothing compared to what remains…”
The soul ends by confessing that even her insights-painful, luminous, transformative as they are-barely scratch the surface of reality. Both her misery and God’s glory are so vast that what she sees is “nothing compared to what remains.” This is the mystic’s final gesture: adoration in the face of mystery.
—
1. What is the context in which the soul begins these considerations?
The soul begins these reflections during what she calls “the sad life,” a time marked by spiritual desolation, inner instability, and incapacity to restrain or endure herself. This sets the stage for the contemplative contrast between divine perfection and human misery, showing how such insights arise from suffering rather than spiritual comfort. In this state, she turns to contemplation of both herself and God to regain stability and perspective.
2. What three divine attributes does the soul meditate upon, and how does she relate them to her ignorance of God?
The soul meditates on divine power, wisdom, and goodness, recognizing that she does not know whence, what, or who God is. She acknowledges that only God’s own power comprehends His origin, only His wisdom understands His essence, and only His goodness knows His identity. These attributes are not accessible through human understanding but are fully comprehended only within the Godhead.
3. How does the soul mirror her reflections on God in her understanding of herself?
Just as the soul confesses her ignorance of God’s origin, nature, and identity, she similarly admits she does not know whence, what, or who she herself is. She says that only God’s power, wisdom, and goodness comprehend her reality. This symmetrical pattern of self and God highlights the depth of her humility: she does not even understand herself apart from divine illumination.
4. How does the soul define her own nature in contrast to God’s?
The soul describes herself as all weakness, all ignorance, and all wretchedness, while God is all power, all wisdom, and all goodness. Furthermore, she says that God is “One Goodness… all in [Him]self,” while she is “One Wretchedness… all in [her]self.” This absolute contrast presents the soul as the inverse of God-He is fullness of being, she is the abyss of deficiency. Yet this recognition is not despairing, but a kind of contemplative truth.
5. What metaphysical contrast does the soul draw between God and herself in terms of being?
The soul declares, “Lord, you are… and I am not,” emphasizing God as the source of all being and herself as essentially nothing apart from Him. God is the one through whom “everything is perfected,” while the soul is the one “through whom nothing is made.” This metaphysical contrast reflects a core mystical doctrine: the soul’s only true being is derived from and dependent on divine being.
6. What theological structure does the soul use to describe her own fallenness?
She uses a parodic inversion of the Trinity: just as God is one God in three persons-Father, Son, and Holy Spirit-she calls herself “one sole enemy” in three miseries: weakness, ignorance, and wretchedness. This startling inversion intensifies the sense of the soul’s alienation from God and from her true self, underscoring the need for divine grace to overcome this threefold misery.
7. According to the soul, how are self-knowledge and knowledge of God proportionally related?
The soul insists that her understanding of God’s power, wisdom, and goodness is directly proportional to her understanding of her own weakness, ignorance, and wretchedness, and vice versa. If she could fully comprehend either set, she would comprehend the other. This implies that true theological knowledge is inseparable from true self-knowledge, and that humility is the condition for all spiritual vision.
8. Why does the soul ultimately claim her knowledge is “so little that one could say better that this is nothing”?
Though the soul has reached profound insights into the nature of God and herself, she confesses that this knowledge is infinitesimal compared to the full reality that remains hidden. Both divine goodness and human wretchedness are so vast that her current understanding seems like “nothing” by comparison. This final acknowledgment reflects the mystical awareness that true knowledge leads to deeper reverence and silence before mystery.
9. How does this chapter function spiritually for the reader or hearer?
This chapter operates as a purifying mirror: it reflects to the reader both the terrifying depth of human misery and the overwhelming majesty of God. But far from leading to despair, this mirroring draws the soul into humility, which is the precondition for union with God. It unburdens the self by burning away illusions of autonomy or adequacy, and it fosters a state of contemplative emptiness receptive to divine grace.
10. How does this chapter connect to the previous seven considerations mentioned earlier?
Whereas the previous considerations reflected on various figures (apostles, Mary, John the Baptist, Christ’s humanity and divinity, the Seraphim), this chapter turns inward. It shifts from external examples to an interior reckoning. If the former were meditations intended to console or edify, this one is a descent into the heart of selfhood in relation to God. It deepens the earlier contemplations by showing their fruit: complete spiritual poverty and radical dependence on divine truth.